In this post, I try to briefly make the case for making models good at moral philosophy. To be up front, aside from some niche areas of moral philosophy, I don’t actually think this is the most important thing to work on for most people. But, depending on the exact scope, I do think it's near competitive. I also like it as an archetype for a broader set of interventions.

After a brief preface (related to the archetype point), the main text of the post is structured as follows:

I say what I mean by moral philosophy. I point out some directions in particular that seem relatively important and that are arguably within the scope of moral philosophy.
I offer a brief explanation of what I mean by making AI systems “better” at moral philosophy. (I give a more detailed account in the appendix.)
I give some examples of the kinds of interventions I have in mind.
Finally, I make the actual case, arguing for importance and tractability (where tractability prices in neglectedness).

I include a lengthy “appendix” with the following content:

A collection of articles by other people making similar arguments
Responses to some common concerns [...]

---

Outline:

(01:42) Preface: What about conceptual reasoning?

(03:06) What do I mean by moral philosophy?

(05:21) Some important issues that we may or may not view as moral philosophy

(09:57) What do I mean by "better"?

(14:40) Concretely what might one do?

(19:42) The case for making AI better at moral philosophy

(24:49) Appendix / further detail

(24:53) Others discussing similar ideas

(25:59) Some concerns about negative externalities

(35:59) What do I mean by "better"? - A more detailed picture

(45:03) Why this is a simpler pitch

(46:42) Further thoughts on tractability

---

First published:
October 14th, 2026

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/auMyz6pjPX5nGLYsL/the-basic-argument-for-making-ai-better-at-moral-philosophy

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

“The basic argument for making AI better at moral philosophy” by Caspar Oesterheld crossposts

LessWrong (30+ Karma)

“The basic argument for making AI better at moral philosophy” by Caspar Oesterheld crossposts