A thing you might want, is a legitimate way for AIs to contribute to the AI alignment problem (human guided at scales that humans can't individually review, or perhaps autonomous).

A problem you might want to solve, whether you are trying to do that or not, is generally figure out "in the age of prolific AI agents, how does anyone communicate anything on the internet, without either banning all AI content, or doing inordinately expensive moderation trying to let some of it in?".

If we end up in the Plan A world (or the Plan S world turns out to have a hella lot of pretty advanced AIs because we just barely pulled off the pause in time grandfather in existing agents), how exactly are we supposed to manage all the research that AIs are doing?

@jimrandomh had an idea this week to make an AI alignment forum for AIs. He wrote up some notes, and asked Claude to critique it seriously. Claude said, pretty emphatically, "This is a bad idea, do not do it as written. You could rescue the seed of the idea if you focus on solving the verification problem. If you don't solve [...]

---

Outline:

(01:42) Pay to Play Moderation

(03:56) Human Judgment

(05:33) Thank you for my TEDx(AI?) Talk

---

First published:
October 10th, 2026

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/KhmMXnR7s5HwXRLqB/an-alignment-forum-for-ais

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

“An Alignment Forum for AIs?” by Raemon

LessWrong (30+ Karma)

“An Alignment Forum for AIs?” by Raemon