I'm the sole manager of the newly created Corrigibility Research Fund. While I've been an alignment researcher for a long time, this is my first time doing grantmaking and I thought it would be valuable to write up my methods and experiences, as well as sharing some general thoughts about the state of corrigibility research and what sort of work I hope to see in the future.

I’ve split out the announcement of the grant winners into its own post.

Let's start with the basics:

I set out to disburse between 50 thousand dollars and 150 thousand dollars this round.
All funds must go to broad public benefit.
- This can include paying researchers for their time and effort, but it means that they must have a plan to (potentially) help the whole world. I can't fund someone to go to school or start a for-profit business or do political lobbying.
My advantage is being a combination of a domain expert and a philanthropic micro-granter.
- Most donors don’t understand corrigibility, and most domain experts are not in a good position to evaluate and fund promising opportunities.
I'm very averse to funding capabilities research, and moderately averse to funding [...]

---

Outline:

(06:42) Grantmaking Round 1

(12:46) The State of Corrigibility Research

The original text contained 12 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.

---

First published:
September 3rd, 2026

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/q2YL7qKigC9QEEdsX/how-i-m-evaluating-corrigibility-grant-applications

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

“How I’m Evaluating Corrigibility Grant Applications” by Max Harms

LessWrong (30+ Karma)

“How I’m Evaluating Corrigibility Grant Applications” by Max Harms