In May 2025 I met Yo Shavit, who was working on national security policy at OpenAI and was thinking about how to prepare for a future in which models could seriously assist attackers in creating pandemics. We had a call, and when I shared notes with my team their main response was: "maybe start with not making models that can do that?"

Which is, in many ways, fair: by continuing to push the frontier in biological capabilities, OpenAI's actions were making things worse on many of the problems SecureBio is trying to solve. But OpenAI stopping wouldn't have resolved the problem: other firms were pushing quickly too, and the economic incentives strongly favored rapid capability advancement. Making the world more resilient to pandemics needed to be a high priority regardless, especially in light of models' increasing ability to help people with biology.

When I thought about what our initial conversations might turn into, however, my primary concerns were whether that might (a) compromise SecureBio's ability to independently assess and criticize OpenAI's work or (b) make the world less safe via reducing model developers' motivation to improve safeguards. I do think there's something to both of these [...]

---

First published:
August 20th, 2026

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Hoxj8tEGGQ7HaLzf4/thoughts-on-taking-openai-foundation-funding

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

“Thoughts on Taking OpenAI Foundation Funding” by jefftk

LessWrong (30+ Karma)

“Thoughts on Taking OpenAI Foundation Funding” by jefftk