The EU Chips Act is failing to secure Europe's semiconductor future because it relies on the flawed, overly ambitious 2013 strategy of doubling market share to 20% by 2030. Despite the hype, the initiative provides minimal direct funding and prioritizes leading-edge nodes at the expense of critical mature-node production. The Nexperia crisis serves as a stark warning, demonstrating how ignoring packaging and mature-node stability leaves the automotive and industrial sectors vulnerable to geopolitical shocks. Rather than chasing the latest AI trends, European policymakers must shift toward a realistic, risk-tested industrial strategy. Adopting a dual-track model—similar to Japan’s approach with TSMC and Rapidus—could better balance high-end innovation with the essential, boring infrastructure required for true supply chain resilience. A fundamental reassessment of metrics and priorities is necessary to avoid repeating past mistakes in the upcoming Chips Act 2.0.
Sign in to continue reading, translating and more.
Open full episode in Podwise
