Some recent events in the tech industry have questioned the spirit of open source, the value of contributions, and the standards that various entities should be held to. This is not a new concept, and it’s often complicated.

SHOW: 738

CLOUD NEWS OF THE WEEK - http://bit.ly/cloudcast-cnotw

CHECK OUT OUR NEW PODCAST - "CLOUDCAST BASICS"

SHOW SPONSORS:

GCore - Global Hosting, CDN, Edge and Cloud Services
Use promocode “CLOUDCAST” to receive a €100 credit on Gcore services
Equinix Global Data Centers and Networking
Learn more and signup at https://deploy.equinix.com/. Use the coupon code CLOUDCAST to get $500 in credits to get started.
Find "Breaking Analysis Podcast with Dave Vellante" on Apple, Google and Spotify
Keep up to data with Enterprise Tech with theCUBE

SHOW NOTES:

Meta’s LLAMA-2 is not Open Source (OSI opinion)
LLAMA-2 doesn’t fit the definition of open source (Twitter)
Are Software Companies Bad Businesses? (Clouded Judgment)
John Rockefeller Jr. and Grand Teton National Park
Grand Tetons National Park (Wyoming, USA)
History of Standard Oil, Trusts and Monopolies

THE TECH WORLD HAS A STRANGE RELATIONSHIP WITH FREE

This past week I didn’t think about tech very often
But coincidentally the world I was in had a historic overlap with some discussions in the tech world.

FREE IS GOOD RIGHT? WHAT ABOUT WHEN IT’S DEEMED TO BE NOT GOOD?

When do we determine that free is a good thing or a bad thing?
When do we determine that work or contributions are valuable? Or invaluable?
Are there always good actors and bad actors when something of value is involved?

FEEDBACK?

Email: show at the cloudcast dot net
Twitter: @thecloudcastnet

Free or Fee is Often Complicated

The Enterprise AI Show

Free or Fee is Often Complicated