29 Jan 2026
38m

Why vague codes of conduct threaten free speech on campus

Podcast cover

The New Zealand Initiative

The podcast explores academic freedom in Australian universities, prompted by concerns over disrupted speakers and vague codes of conduct. Former Chief Justice of Australia, Robert French, discusses his 2019 report and the voluntary code developed to address these issues. A key focus is the distinction between general free speech and academic freedom, defining the latter as related to expertise and the employment relationship between staff and universities. French highlights problematic terminology in university codes, such as "bringing the university into disrepute" or conflicting with the values of the governing council. The conversation also covers the importance of institutional neutrality, with the consensus that universities shouldn't take public positions on issues outside their core functions to avoid chilling free expression.

Outlines

Part 1: Context, Codes, and Terminology

Part 2: Defining Academic Freedom

Part 3: Operational Principles and Constraints

Part 4: Adoption, Accountability, and Neutrality

Sign in to continue reading, translating and more.

Open full episode in Podwise