[24-38] Little v. Hecox

The podcast presents oral arguments in the case of Little v. Hecox, concerning Idaho's law on sex-based classifications in sports. Arguments center on whether the law, which excludes transgender women from women's sports, violates equal protection. Key points of contention include the validity of sex-based classifications, the existence and nature of as-applied equal protection challenges, and whether the law discriminates based on transgender status. The discussion involves scrutiny levels, scientific evidence of athletic advantages, and comparisons to previous cases like Caban and VMI. The argument also addresses mootness, considering the plaintiff's changed intentions regarding participation in sports.