So this post brought to you by Beren today is about how a lot of claims about within-paradigm algorithmic progress is actually mostly about just getting better data, leading to a Flynn effect, and the reason I'm mentioning this is because once we have to actually build new fabs and we run out of data in 2028-2031, progress will be slower than people expect (assuming we havent reached AGI by then).

When forecasting AI progress, the forecasters and modellers often break AI progress down into two components: increased compute, and ‘algorithmic progress’. My argument here is that the term ‘algorithmic progress’ for ‘the remainder after compute’ is misleading and that we should really think about and model AI progress as three terms – compute, algorithms, and data. My claim is that a large fraction (but certainly not all) AI progress that is currently conceived as ‘algorithmic progress’ is actually ‘data progress’, and that this term ‘algorithmic’ gives a false impression about what are the key forces and key improvements that have driven AI progress in the past three years or so.

From experience in the field, there have not been that many truly ‘algorithmic’ improvements with massive impact. The [...]

---

First published:
December 10th, 2025

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/3uMZFbvJZ8Z5LqpyQ/most-algorithmic-progress-is-data-progress-linkpost

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

“Most Algorithmic Progress is Data Progress [Linkpost]” by Noosphere89

LessWrong (30+ Karma)

“Most Algorithmic Progress is Data Progress [Linkpost]” by Noosphere89