Summary: Anthropic has many employees with an EA-ish outlook, who may soon have a lot of money. If you also have that kind of outlook, money donated sooner will likely be much higher impact.

It's December, and I'm trying to figure out how much to donate. This is usually a straightforward question: give 50%. But this year I'm considering dipping into savings.

There are many EAs and EA-informed employees at Anthropic, which has been very successful and is reportedly considering an IPO. The Manifold market estimates a median IPO date of June 2027:

At a floated $300B valuation and many EAs among their early employees, the amount of additional funding could be in the billions. Efforts I'd most want to support may become less constrained by money than capacity: as I've experienced in running the NAO, scaling programs takes time. This means donations now seem more valuable; ones that help organizations get into a position to productively apply further funding especially so.

In retrospect I wish I'd been able to support 80,000 Hours more substantially before Open Philanthropy Coefficient Giving began funding them; this time, with more ability to see what's likely [...]

---

First published:
December 3rd, 2025

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/oJM6TmFLwsHrBfRpk/front-load-giving-because-of-anthropic-donors

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

“Front-Load Giving Because of Anthropic Donors?” by jefftk

LessWrong (30+ Karma)

“Front-Load Giving Because of Anthropic Donors?” by jefftk