What if you could remove some information from the weights of an AI? Would that be helpful?

It is clearly useful against some misuse concerns: if you are concerned that LLMs will make it easier to build bioweapons because they have memorized such information, removing the memorized facts would remove this misuse concern.

In a paper Aghyad Deeb and I just released, we show it is tractable to evaluate the presence of certain undesirable facts in an LLM: take independent facts that should have all been removed, fine-tune on some of them, and see if accuracy increases on the other ones. The fine-tuning process should make the model “try” to answer, but if the information was removed from the weights (and if the facts are actually independent), then accuracy on the held-out facts should remain low.

Removing information from the weights is stronger than the usual notion of [...]

---

Outline:

(01:50) Do current unlearning techniques remove facts from model weights?

(04:24) Hopes for successful information removal

(06:51) Using information removal to reduce x-risk

(06:56) Information you should probably remove from the weights

(08:20) How removing information helps you

(09:20) Information you probably can’t remove - and why this won’t work for superintelligent AIs

The original text contained 5 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.

The original text contained 2 images which were described by AI.

---

First published:
October 14th, 2024

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/9AbYkAy8s9LvB7dT5/the-case-for-unlearning-that-removes-information-from-llm

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

---

Images from the article:

Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.

“The case for unlearning that removes information from LLM weights” by Fabien Roger

LessWrong (30+ Karma)

“The case for unlearning that removes information from LLM weights” by Fabien Roger