In a new post, Nostalgebraist argues that "AI doomerism has its roots in anti-deathist transhumanism", representing a break from the normal human expectation of mortality and generational change.

They argue that traditionally, each generation has accepted that they will die but that the human race as a whole will continue evolving in ways they cannot fully imagine or control.

Nostalgebraist argues that the "anti-deathist" view, however, anticipates a future where "we are all gonna die" is no longer true -- a future where the current generation doesn't have to die or cede control of the future to their descendants.

Nostalgebraist sees this desire to "strangle posterity" and "freeze time in place" by making one's own generation immortal as contrary to human values, which have always involved an ongoing process of change and progress from generation to generation.

This argument reminds me of Elon Musk's common refrain [...]

---

First published:
May 27th, 2024

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/tNi5CECBMAGa2N6sp/being-against-involuntary-death-and-being-open-to-change-are

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

“Being against involuntary death and being open to change are compatible” by Andy_McKenzie

LessWrong (30+ Karma)

“Being against involuntary death and being open to change are compatible” by Andy_McKenzie