1. Guillaume Lambert introduces his talk with a grave prediction that a protocol's token is likely to go to zero unless it is deliberately and thoughtfully designed.
2. He uses the analogy of a drain to model the US economy as presented in the book "The Deficit Myth" by Stephanie Kelton, correlating it with how tokenomics functions in cryptocurrency, and how this can be similar to the tokenomics of ETH.
3. Lambert highlights different reasons tokens might go to zero, such as high inflation in certain countries, company value depreciation, or association with failed institutions like FTX.
4. He discusses the typical responses to devaluing of tokens/currency and emphasizes the unique challenges in decentralized systems that make recovery or redesign difficult.
5. Lambert suggests using his options protocol, Panoptic, as a way to profit from bearish markets by employing strategies like selling calls or buying puts.
6. Supply control, through issuance and burn rates, and the demand for a token, including its utility and intrinsic value, are central to the token's overall stability and risk of devaluing to zero.
7. He brings up case studies of different token systems and their equilibriums: Bitcoin's neutral equilibrium due to its capped supply, Solana's somewhat instability due to its staking mechanism, DAO's inherent instability due to human factors, and Ethereum's stable equilibrium facilitated by EIP 1559 and supply dynamics.
8. He concludes with the observation that Ethereum's tokenomics is well-designed for stability, posing a contrast to the ever-increasing nature of the US dollar supply, which he describes as stable yet inflationary.

Questions & Answers

How does the analogy of a drain model the US economy and how does it relate to cryptocurrency?
- The drain analogy models the US economy as a bathtub where the faucet represents money being printed by the government and the drain signifies taxes removing money from circulation. This relates to cryptocurrency by showing similar dynamics of token issuance (faucet) and token burn mechanisms (drain).

How can a token's value go to zero and what are traditional responses to this issue?
- A token's value can go to zero through excessive inflation, loss of company value, or through association with failed entities. Traditional responses include hiring new leadership or restructuring, but these solutions are complicated in decentralized systems that lack a unified governing body.

What strategies does Guillaume Lambert suggest for profiting in bear markets?
- He suggests using his options protocol, Panoptic, to engage in strategies like selling calls or buying puts on tokens that are anticipated to devalue, which allows for profiting from the downturn.

What are the main factors contributing to a token's stability or risk of devaluation?
- The main factors include the token's supply control via issuance and burn rates, and the demand for the token which encompasses its utility, intrinsic value, governance through voting, and speculation.

What do the case studies of Bitcoin, Solana, DAOs, and Ethereum suggest about their respective tokenomics?
- Bitcoin has a capped supply and is considered to have a neutral equilibrium. Solana's tokenomics potentially leads to instability due to its staking mechanism and fixed future inflation rate. DAOs are seen as inherently unstable due to human factors in governance. Ethereum's mechanism of a burn rate and a square root function for staking rewards is seen as indicative of a stable equilibrium.

Core Takeaway:
- The core problem identified in the talk is the risk of a protocol's token devaluating to zero, a common fate unless carefully architected to maintain value through balanced supply and demand dynamics.
- The consequences of not understanding or solving this issue include loss of investment,...

Your Protocol's Token Will Go to Zero. Here's How to Fix It | Guillaume Lambert - Panoptic

Higher Signal: Get Smarter. Faster.