Damon Binder recently wrote up an argument for prioritizing air filtration over far-UVC for pathogen control:

UVC and filtration are close substitutes—both deliver effective air changes per hour, both reduce airborne pathogen concentrations by the same amount per eACH—and on current pricing, filtration is cheaper.

There's a lot of good stuff in his analysis, but I see [1] three considerations that really change the bottom line:

Cost is actually much lower.
Noise is a serious issue.
Performance is dramatically higher in larger rooms.

Cost is straightforward. Binder priced far-UVC based on the high-quality Care222 lamp with the Krypton-11 at $2,500, but there's a much cheaper option, the Aerolamp at $500. It's also moderately higher output.

Binder analyzes a 30m2 room with a 2.5m ceiling. I'll assume this means 6x5x2.5. If I configure Illuminate with an Aerolamp in one corner pointed 0.5m above the far corner the installation is within TLVs and I get a median effective number of hourly air changes (eACH) of 11.6. The lamp degrades approximately linearly over Binder's 11,000 hour evaluation period down to 70% capacity, so we're averaging an eACH of [...]

---

First published:
April 27th, 2026

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/wkeXF6xEL7bLnwpWG/contra-binder-on-far-uvc-and-filtration

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

---

Images from the article:

Black speaker or amplifier unit on table with power cord plugged in.

Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.

“Contra Binder on far-UVC and filtration” by jefftk

LessWrong (30+ Karma)