AI is reaching the point where there is wild speculation, potential regulations, and opinions on if it will destroy humanity. So how does anyone make sense of all of it?

SHOW: 770

CLOUD NEWS OF THE WEEK - http://bit.ly/cloudcast-cnotw

CHECK OUT OUR NEW PODCAST - "CLOUDCAST BASICS"

SHOW SPONSORS:

Code Comments - An original podcast from Red Hat (Season 2)
Adjusting to new technology, from teams that have been through it
Find "Breaking Analysis Podcast with Dave Vellante" on Apple, Google and Spotify
Keep up to data with Enterprise Tech with theCUBE

SHOW NOTES:

ARE WE UNDER OR OVER REACTING TO THE AI POSSIBILITIES?

Oppenheimer said the possibility of destruction was “near zero”
OpenAI research said it’s 10-20% chance of human destruction

WHAT ARE THE OPEN, REGULATIVE AND STRUCTURAL GUARDRAILS OF AI

What is good or bad with AI?
Should societal concerns be considered? By whom?
Should environmental concerns be considered? By whom?

FEEDBACK?

Email: show at the cloudcast dot net
Twitter: @thecloudcastnet

Is AI the new Oppenheimer event?

The Reasoning Show