
A recent verdict against Meta and YouTube is explored, focusing on how the platforms' design, rather than user-generated content, contributed to a young woman's mental health struggles. The case circumvented Section 230, which generally shields social media companies from liability. The plaintiff argued that features like infinite scroll and notifications are intentionally designed to be addictive, akin to product liability claims against other industries. Referencing internal research, the plaintiff's attorneys drew parallels to Big Tobacco, highlighting how social media companies allegedly knew about the harmful effects of their products on children. While Meta and YouTube plan to appeal, this verdict could lead to significant changes in how social media companies operate, potentially impacting user engagement and business models.
Sign in to continue reading, translating and more.
Continue