Camp Swamp Road Ep. 6: Your Side, Their Side and the Truth

The episode focuses on the immunity hearing for Weldon Boyd and Bradley Williams in the wrongful death lawsuit filed by Jennifer Spivey, following the killing of Scott Spivey. The central question is whether Boyd and Williams acted in self-defense under South Carolina's Stand Your Ground law. Key evidence includes conflicting witness testimonies, particularly from Blaise Ward and Frank McMurrow, and recorded phone calls where Boyd made light of the shooting. Judge Griffith ultimately denies immunity for Boyd, questioning his credibility based on inconsistencies in his testimony and behavior after the shooting. The judge will decide on Williams' immunity later. Jennifer Spivey expresses relief at the judge's conclusion, viewing it as validation of her long-held beliefs about the case.

Outlines

Part 1: Case Introduction, Opening Arguments

Part 2: Evidence, Witness Testimony

Part 3: Defendant Testimony, Cross-Examination

Part 4: Ruling, Future Outlook

Sign in to continue reading, translating and more.

Continue

The Journal.

Part 1: Case Introduction, Opening Arguments

Introduction to the Immunity Hearing in the Scott Spivey Case

Opening Arguments: Conflicting Narratives in the Spivey Case

Part 2: Evidence, Witness Testimony

Defense Presents Evidence: Highway 9 Witnesses and 911 Call

Witness Testimony: Blaze Ward and Frank McMurrow Recant Initial Statements

Officer Higgs' Body Cam Footage and Boyd's Testimony Begins

Part 3: Defendant Testimony, Cross-Examination

Boyd's Testimony: The Shooting and the "Act Like a Victim" Note

Cross-Examination of Boyd: Inconsistencies and Contradictions

Part 4: Ruling, Future Outlook

Judge Denies Immunity for Boyd: Credibility Issues and Foolish Behavior

Aftermath and Future of the Case: Jennifer Spivey's Perspective

Camp Swamp Road Ep. 6: Your Side, Their Side and the Truth

The Journal.

Part 1: Case Introduction, Opening Arguments

00:00Introduction to the Immunity Hearing in the Scott Spivey Case

Introduction to the Immunity Hearing in the Scott Spivey Case

03:25Opening Arguments: Conflicting Narratives in the Spivey Case

Opening Arguments: Conflicting Narratives in the Spivey Case

Part 2: Evidence, Witness Testimony

08:14Defense Presents Evidence: Highway 9 Witnesses and 911 Call

Defense Presents Evidence: Highway 9 Witnesses and 911 Call

13:33Witness Testimony: Blaze Ward and Frank McMurrow Recant Initial Statements

Witness Testimony: Blaze Ward and Frank McMurrow Recant Initial Statements

19:07Officer Higgs' Body Cam Footage and Boyd's Testimony Begins

Officer Higgs' Body Cam Footage and Boyd's Testimony Begins

Part 3: Defendant Testimony, Cross-Examination

25:17Boyd's Testimony: The Shooting and the "Act Like a Victim" Note

Boyd's Testimony: The Shooting and the "Act Like a Victim" Note

32:43Cross-Examination of Boyd: Inconsistencies and Contradictions

Cross-Examination of Boyd: Inconsistencies and Contradictions

Part 4: Ruling, Future Outlook

38:47Judge Denies Immunity for Boyd: Credibility Issues and Foolish Behavior

Judge Denies Immunity for Boyd: Credibility Issues and Foolish Behavior

45:57Aftermath and Future of the Case: Jennifer Spivey's Perspective

Aftermath and Future of the Case: Jennifer Spivey's Perspective