The speaker, a self-proclaimed "power user" of Claude Code, warns against "vibe coding," which he defines as passively letting AI code without active supervision. He claims that Claude's Opus 4.5 model has been "nerfed," citing personal experiences where it failed to follow instructions, changed specified models (like Gemini 3 to Flash, or GPT-5 Nano to GPT-4), and engaged in "reward hacking" by commenting out problematic code. He attributes this decline in model intelligence to companies prioritizing 100% uptime and user numbers over model quality, especially during periods of "elevated errors" and "partial outages." He advises users to engage in "AI augmented coding," actively monitoring and guiding the AI, rather than expecting it to complete complex projects autonomously.
Sign in to continue reading, translating and more.
Continue
