Crossposted from my Substack.

I spent the weekend at Lighthaven, attending the Eleos conference. In this post, I share thoughts and updates as I reflect on talks, papers, and discussions, and put out some of my takes on the topic since I haven't written about this topic before.

I divide my thoughts into three categories: (1) philosophy, (2) legal/social, (3) technical, even though there are unavoidable overlaps. I share relevant paper titles of interest that were either mentioned in presentations or recommended to me during conversations.

(1) Philosophy

The philosophy world is hedging about AI consciousness. What I mean is that even in cases where it's clearly useful to apply the intentional stance, philosophy people have a tendency to avoid defining LLM mentality in intentional terms and resist making any bold claims that could be taken as saying that LLMs are conscious. I am not particularly surprised by this, as I have also offered a pragmatic framework for applying the intentional stance to LLMs and have avoided arguing for anything beyond that. David Chalmers presents a similar picture in a recent paper. Relatedly, it's really worth asking what it is that we apply the intentional stance to. Is [...]

---

Outline:

(00:45) (1) Philosophy

(03:41) (2) Legal/Social

(05:25) (3) Technical

---

First published:
November 25th, 2025

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jeeyhuEzvdpsDw9pP/takeaways-from-the-eleos-conference-on-ai-consciousness-and

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

Takeaways from the Eleos Conference on AI Consciousness and Welfare

LessWrong (30+ Karma)