MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin treasury strategy creates a contentious valuation debate centered on its market net asset value (MNAV) premium. Jim Chanos maintains a short position, arguing that the premium is unsustainable due to agency risks, corporate tax liabilities, and the proliferation of competing Bitcoin treasury companies that increase market supply. Conversely, Pierre Rochard defends the premium as a rational reflection of MSTR’s unique structural advantages, including its ability to issue debt and preferred stock to acquire Bitcoin, which provides leverage inaccessible to individual investors. While Chanos views the recent surge in corporate Bitcoin issuance as a catalyst for multiple compression, Rochard posits that Bitcoin’s long-term growth and MSTR’s first-mover liquidity moats justify the premium. The dialogue highlights the fundamental tension between holding spot Bitcoin versus investing in a corporate structure designed to amplify exposure through strategic leverage.
Sign in to continue reading, translating and more.
Continue
