In this episode of Philosophize This!, Stephen West delves into a critical analysis of Stoicism through the contrasting perspectives of Friedrich Nietzsche and Arthur Schopenhauer. Nietzsche critiques Stoicism for its lack of life-affirmation and over-reliance on rational order, which he believes leads to a denial of essential aspects of human existence like passion and creativity. He argues that Stoics wrongly project their values onto the universe, limiting their experiences and potential for self-overcoming. Conversely, Schopenhauer views Stoicism as too life-affirming, particularly in its focus on avoiding suffering, which he sees as a fundamental part of life. He argues that Stoicism is a selfish pursuit of inner peace that ultimately disconnects individuals from genuine compassion and a deeper understanding of existence, advocating instead for embracing suffering to gain wisdom and transcend the will.
Sign in to continue reading, translating and more.
Continue