The industry is debating whether AI should be viewed as augmenting or replacing human-centric tasks. But we don’t yet have a framework to discuss the technical and business impacts of that spectrum of decisions.

SHOW: 926

SHOW TRANSCRIPT: The Cloudcast #926 Transcript

SHOW VIDEO: https://youtube.com/@TheCloudcastNET

CLOUD NEWS OF THE WEEK: http://bit.ly/cloudcast-cnotw

CHECK OUT OUR NEW PODCAST: "CLOUDCAST BASICS"

SHOW SPONSORS:

[US CLOUD] Cut Enterprise IT Support Costs by 30-50% with US Cloud
[VASION] Vasion Print eliminates the need for print servers by enabling secure, cloud-based printing from any device, anywhere. Get a custom demo to see the difference for yourself.

SHOW NOTES:

The final 5% of AI success

HOW DO WE THINK ABOUT THE INVOLVEMENT OF HUMANS WITH AI SYSTEMS?

What do we think AI systems should be capable of?
What do we think human systems should be capable of?
We know how to quantify error, but do we really know how to quantify error?
Almost every question about AI comes down to augment vs. replace, and yet humans tend to skew towards the replace angle.
We like the thought of humans in the loop, but often don’t want to be bothered to interact with humans
We haven’t yet created a framework to think about the human +/- AI involvement, because we haven’t really created it for general-purpose automation yet either.

FEEDBACK?

AI and the 95% vs 5% debate

The Reasoning Show