This episode explores the field of Mad Studies and its interdisciplinary approach to mental health. Against the backdrop of traditional mental health frameworks often characterized by binaries like pro/anti-psychiatry, the editors of "The Mad Studies Reader" discuss the importance of shifting the focus from determining who is "right" to fostering inclusive dialogue and diverse perspectives. More significantly, they emphasize the need to challenge sanism—the prejudice and discrimination against those labeled "mad"—and highlight how this intersects with other forms of social injustice. For instance, the discussion delves into the limitations of solely medical or psychological approaches, advocating for the integration of lived experiences, artistic expressions, and activism. The editors detail the collaborative process of creating the reader, emphasizing the inclusion of artists, activists, clinicians, and scholars to create a comprehensive resource. Ultimately, this episode underscores the value of interdisciplinary collaboration in understanding mental health and difference, advocating for a more democratic and inclusive approach to mental health discourse.
Sign in to continue reading, translating and more.
Continue