This is a link post.

Can you tell when an LLM is lying from the activations? Are simple methods good enough? We recently published a paper investigating if linear probes detect when Llama is deceptive.

Abstract:

AI models might use deceptive strategies as part of scheming or misaligned behaviour. Monitoring outputs alone is insufficient, since the AI might produce seemingly benign outputs while its internal reasoning is misaligned. We thus evaluate if linear probes can robustly detect deception by monitoring model activations. We test two probe-training datasets, one with contrasting instructions to be honest or deceptive (following Zou et al., 2023) and one of responses to simple roleplaying scenarios. We test whether these probes generalize to realistic settings where Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct behaves deceptively, such as concealing insider trading (Scheurer et al., 2023) and purposely underperforming on safety evaluations (Benton et al., 2024). We find that our probe distinguishes honest and deceptive [...]

The original text contained 1 footnote which was omitted from this narration.

The original text contained 4 images which were described by AI.

---

First published:
February 6th, 2025

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/9pGbTz6c78PGwJein/detecting-strategic-deception-using-linear-probes

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

---

Images from the article:

Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.

“Detecting Strategic Deception Using Linear Probes” by Nicholas Goldowsky-Dill, bilalchughtai, StefanHex, Marius Hobbhahn

LessWrong (30+ Karma)