Technological progress is not inherently Pareto improving, as the pace of innovation is fundamentally dictated by the power dynamics between those who benefit from new technologies and the "losers" who possess the political leverage to obstruct them. Carl Benedikt Frey, an expert on the future of work and AI at Oxford University, argues that the Industrial Revolution’s transition from labor-replacing to labor-enabling technologies—coupled with the rise of the welfare state—historically mitigated social unrest. While the current AI revolution mirrors the labor-replacing nature of the First Industrial Revolution more than the second, its long-term impact on productivity depends on whether it fosters entirely new industries or merely automates existing tasks. Ultimately, the ability of societies to navigate these shifts depends on institutional frameworks that facilitate labor mobility and education, rather than relying on the assumption that technological growth will automatically distribute prosperity.
Sign in to continue reading, translating and more.
Continue