In this episode of "Awakening from the Meaning Crisis," Dr. John Vervaeke delves into the cognitive science of wisdom, emphasizing its connection to meaning and rationality. He revisits McGee and Barber's argument about wisdom as seeing through illusion, highlighting its perspectival and participatory nature. The discussion covers the rationality debate, examining Cohen's argument that humans are fundamentally rational at the level of competence and Stanovich and West's counter-argument that errors are systematic and reflect competence issues. Vervaeke explores Cherniak's invocation of the Finitary Predicament and relevance realization, as well as Smedlund's argument on the interpretation of experiments and the distinction between fallacy and misunderstanding. He concludes by discussing Stanovich's perspective on cognitive styles, active open-mindedness, and the need for cognition, setting the stage for future exploration of wisdom and enlightenment.
Sign in to continue reading, translating and more.
Continue