This podcast episode delves into the scandal involving Dan Ariely and Francesca Gino, two prominent researchers known for their work on behavioral science and nudges. The episode explores the impact of the scandal on their careers and reputation in the field, including the cancellation of TV show plans based on Ariely's bestselling book. It also discusses the role of a spreadsheet detective in uncovering fraudulent research practices and highlights the importance of replication in scientific research. The episode further examines the discovery of manipulated data in the field of social science and its repercussions, such as retracted papers and administrative actions against the individuals involved. It concludes by discussing the evolving story of Dan Ariely's involvement in the controversy and the importance of data integrity and transparency in research.
Anti-commonsence
1. The scandal involving behavioral science researchers Dan Ariely and Francesca Gino challenges the previous perception of their honesty and integrity, posing questions about the trustworthiness of academic research.
2. The experiment on the Guatemalan tax website, based on the concept of honesty pledges, failed to improve tax compliance, questioning the effectiveness of behavioral science interventions in real-world scenarios.
3. The discovery of fraudulent research studies and manipulated data highlights the need for greater vigilance and scrutiny in the field of social science research.
4. The revelation that the data in Dan Ariely's insurance study was manipulated raises doubts about the accuracy and reliability of his previous work.
5. The involvement of a spreadsheet detective in uncovering discrepancies and fraud in research highlights the potential for misconduct and fraudulent practices in academia.
