This podcast episode explores the influence of historical facts and amicus briefs on Supreme Court decisions. It highlights the challenges posed by inaccurate data and the reliance on preexisting opinions. The episode discusses the rise of the legal realists and the impact of the Brandeis brief in revolutionizing the court's decision-making process. It also delves into the significance of amicus briefs and the lack of fact-checking mechanisms. The episode raises questions about the role of historical interpretations, the court's final decision-making power, and the importance of accurate information in shaping legal decisions.
