In this episode of Citations Needed, Nima Shirazi and Adam Johnson dissect the role and influence of editorial boards, particularly those of major newspapers like The New York Times and The Washington Post, focusing on their tone, historical context, and impact on shaping public opinion. They critique the anonymous nature of these boards, their tendency to uphold establishment consensus, and their often condescending approach to presenting information. Joined by Jim Naureckas and Janine Jackson from Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR), the hosts discuss how these editorial boards often act as gatekeepers against progressive change, perpetuate a benevolent view of U.S. foreign policy, and maintain a status quo that serves the interests of the powerful. The conversation explores specific examples, such as the Times' coverage of forever wars and police violence, and the Post's stance on foreign policy, highlighting the media's structural support for the national security state and political establishment.
Sign in to continue reading, translating and more.
Continue