In this post, I summarize some of my thoughts on OpenAI's recent preparedness framework. The post focuses on my opinions/analysis of the framework, and it doesn't have much summary (for readers unfamiliar with the framework, I recommend Zvi's post).

As a high-level point, I believe voluntary commitments from individual labs will be insufficient, and I'm most excited about policies that governments could apply to all AGI corporations. Nonetheless, I think efforts from individual labs can be useful, and it's important for government-focused AI policy experts to engage with the ideas coming out of top AGI companies[1].

With that in mind, throughout the post, I try not to harp on pessimistic points like "more is needed", "this document hasn't single-handedly saved the day or addressed race dynamics", or "how does this prevent competitive pressures+race dynamics from forcing everyone to proceed incautiously". (I think these critiques are useful, but that [...]

---

Outline:

(01:14) Communication

(04:36) Content

(06:40) Critiques and Recommended Changes

The original text contained 2 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.

---

First published:
January 2nd, 2024

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/G2AghCGjGCkhWiFDd/openai-s-preparedness-framework-praise-and-recommendations

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

“OpenAI’s Preparedness Framework: Praise & Recommendations” by Akash

LessWrong (30+ Karma)